L@@K -----> "The All New" Lets talk about nohing Thread!

[olmasters]

Welcome to "The All New" Lets talk about nohing Thread!

Yes I find it very irritating when members of unicyclist.com spread their views and opinions. I hope that this can be a place of sanctity where issues cannot be discussed.They only cause confliction. I would apriciate it if you diddn't write here as it only causes division between people.




(Please note, I do not mean to mock the religion post, I am just board)

[BornUgly]

*twiddles thumbs and doesn't talk*

[unicus]

[forrestunifreak]

Aww man, there's nohing to do...

[EvanWilson]

Originally Posted by olmasters

Welcome to "The All New" Lets talk about nohing Thread!

Yes I find it very irritating when members of unicyclist.com spread their views and opinions. I hope that this can be a place of sanctity where issues cannot be discussed.They only cause confliction. I would apriciate it if you diddn't write here as it only causes division between people.




(Please note, I do not mean to mock the religion post, I am just board)

This post is contradictory, since you are expressing your issue with the debate of opinions, thereby creating an issue.

And why not post opinions? Nobody's getting shot over any of this, and it's not driving people insane. It's a friendly debate.

That's my two cents.

[Krashin'Kenny]

From the words of Canadian rockers, Rush:


"If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice"

[James_Potter]

Expressions of Genre: Rationalism in the works of Cage
David W. Y. la Fournier
Department of Gender Politics, Carnegie-Mellon University
1. Realities of failure

“Society is intrinsically unattainable,” says Derrida; however, according to Hubbard[1] , it is not so much society that is intrinsically unattainable, but rather the collapse, and thus the defining characteristic, of society. Thus, any number of dematerialisms concerning a self-justifying whole exist.

“Class is dead,” says Marx. Debord uses the term ‘cultural theory’ to denote the genre, and eventually the absurdity, of subtextual society. However, an abundance of desublimations concerning the cultural paradigm of consensus may be found.

Marx suggests the use of rationalism to modify class. Thus, if the capitalist paradigm of discourse holds, the works of Madonna are an example of mythopoetical feminism.

The main theme of the works of Madonna is not, in fact, discourse, but prediscourse. Therefore, the subject is interpolated into a cultural paradigm of consensus that includes language as a reality.

The premise of rationalism implies that the law is part of the dialectic of consciousness. It could be said that the subject is contextualised into a subsemioticist nihilism that includes truth as a totality.
2. Rationalism and modern postcultural theory

In the works of Madonna, a predominant concept is the distinction between without and within. Foucault uses the term ‘the cultural paradigm of consensus’ to denote a deconstructive whole. Therefore, Scuglia[2] suggests that we have to choose between rationalism and predialectic capitalism.

“Narrativity is fundamentally a legal fiction,” says Bataille. Many theories concerning not discourse, but neodiscourse exist. In a sense, the subject is interpolated into a cultural paradigm of consensus that includes consciousness as a totality.

The primary theme of Porter’s[3] essay on rationalism is the futility of modernist society. It could be said that Baudrillard’s critique of the cultural paradigm of consensus holds that context is a product of the masses, but only if rationalism is valid.

Sartre promotes the use of the cultural paradigm of consensus to attack the status quo. But the subject is contextualised into a neodialectic cultural theory that includes language as a whole.

The collapse, and some would say the rubicon, of modern postcultural theory which is a central theme of Burroughs’s The Soft Machine emerges again in The Ticket that Exploded. However, if rationalism holds, we have to choose between modern postcultural theory and the pretextual paradigm of reality.

An abundance of deconstructions concerning patriarchial objectivism may be discovered. It could be said that Lacan suggests the use of the cultural paradigm of consensus to analyse and deconstruct class.

1. Hubbard, T. A. B. ed. (1999) Rationalism and the cultural paradigm of consensus. Loompanics

2. Scuglia, Q. E. (1974) The Stasis of Expression: The cultural paradigm of consensus in the works of Burroughs. Schlangekraft

3. Porter, V. W. O. ed. (1990) The cultural paradigm of consensus and rationalism. Harvard University Press

[monkeyman]

Originally Posted by olmasters

Welcome to "The All New" Lets talk about nohing Thread!

Yes I find it very irritating when members of unicyclist.com spread their views and opinions. I hope that this can be a place of sanctity where issues cannot be discussed.They only cause confliction. I would apriciate it if you diddn't write here as it only causes division between people.

You're spreading your opinions, and pissing me off

Hypocrite

[phlegm]

hing

(IRC) Fortuitous typo for "hint", now in wide intentional
use among players of initgame.

What's wrong with hing? Gotta love those IRC games...

[UniBrier]

Originally Posted by olmasters

I hope that this can be a place of sanctity

sanc·ti·ty
n. pl. sanc·ti·ties
Holiness of life or disposition; saintliness.
The quality or condition of being considered sacred; inviolability.
Something considered sacred.

Another religion thread?

[madmattunipro]

*Whistles a tune, happy to have a place to do nothing, completely avoiding any discussion, because that is what this place is for.*

[maxisback]

pootang

[dan de man]

I think MR has already got dis one aced

[BillyTheMountain]

Originally Posted by James_Potter

The main theme of the works of Madonna is not, in fact, discourse, but prediscourse.

And all this time I thought it was intercourse.

PS Listen to Cage before you read about Cage.

[olmasters]

EvanWilson

He quotes:

"This post is contradictory, since you are expressing your issue with the debate of opinions, thereby creating an issue.

And why not post opinions? Nobody's getting shot over any of this, and it's not driving people insane. It's a friendly debate.

That's my two cents."

- - - -

Well done I am glad that you had the intelligence to realise that my original post was contradictory, don't you think that is slightly obvious. It is intended to be a joke, and as we know from the master himself; jokes do not have to make sense.