![]() |
![]() |
#61 | |
Unicyclist
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 952
|
Quote:
![]() Look at the chainstay junction joining to the Bottom bracket. That's it there. The frame will weigh a little bit more, but not much. It'll cost a bit more than usual, I'm not sure exactly how much, but it'll be made in a very tiny and exclusive batch. I want it to be available as a 19" only, it's not entirely necessary as the current design is more than ideal already. Just for those who might like a more 'solid' look. Ideally more suited for trials. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#62 |
jarin erickson
|
ah more competition for my Carbon frames! how light is your standard 19" frame suposed to weigh?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#63 |
sander
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: the netherlands
Posts: 275
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#64 | |
Unicyclist
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 952
|
Quote:
People who want your carbon frames and Triton's titanium frames will be of a similar market, but not the same. I don't think they would affect eachother all that much. People who want a Triton are looking for the best, and only that. The only true competition for us 'exotic frame brands' are the current existing ones like KH and Koxx. They offer more normal types of metals at a commercially large level with lower prices to accomodate for the majority of the riding population. The quality control of Triton frames will be even more strict and tight, there is always room for improvement anywhere. Nothing less than manufacturing-perfection* will leave the factory. *As close as is possible, nothing in manufacture or life can be 100% perfect Last edited by Sponge; 2009-05-28 at 12:01 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#65 |
jarin erickson
|
well i will be interested in seeing which sells more, cf or Ti.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#66 |
Unicyclist
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 952
|
It's not a matter of which sells more. It all depends on price and availability.
Your CF frames are likely to be much cheaper, and generally easier for North Americans to get hold of, and the waiting period for it to be built would be shorter too. Those looking for a little something different to a KH may well go for your frames. On the contrary, I'm more interested in the quality, design, and all-round 'finesse' of the frames rather than which outsells which. Quality rather than quantity, as the ol' cliched phrase goes ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#67 | |
jarin erickson
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#68 |
Unicyclist
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 952
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#69 |
jarin erickson
|
oh its more of i want to see what people favor more Ti or Cf not really which company comes out on top. im looking at consumer preferences.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#70 | |
Unicyclist
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 952
|
Quote:
Your CF frames, if following what the process of what the Fournales/Goldtech biketrials CF-Alu fork went through, should end up being quite promising. The pressing in of thin aluminium tubes inside the CF tubes aids the stiffness a lot, I hope you've done that for yours, because CF tubing on its own is very very flexy. Some people just don't want a flexy frame. Those who want Tritons are in a special market of their own. No other frame will do for them. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#71 | |
Nation of Champions
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Age: 25
Posts: 115
|
Quote:
also tbh, I was considering one of ur CF frames but then i realised there were loads of little flaws and quirks that needed addressing. the testing that went into the CF frames doesnt seem that rigorous either, so i'm not convinced. judging by my brother's road biking and XC biking experience, CF tends to fracture after coming in contact with hard hits.. which is so common in trials and street. The kind of impacts that would dent a KH or a Koxx frame would likely shatter a CF tube. it's logic! Also yer... good point Sponge about the alu tubes in the CF, when my engineering friend made some custom CF forks for his Racing BMX he did that bonding process too... worked a treat and only gained a few grams... otherwise the CF legs would flex like crazy and feel mushy and shit. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#72 |
Unicyclist
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 952
|
We might as well have some more pictures!:
Osmundo's Triton Sponge 36'er w/KH Schlumpf Hub |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#73 |
Wolfgang
|
Ti over Cf Any day, especially since I've ridden one a few times.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#74 |
USMC
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Peoria, Illinois
Age: 28
Posts: 1,097
|
I had no idea osmundo went with an integrated clamp. Looks svelt.
__________________
Unicycle for Ra |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#75 | |
Mono de España
|
Carbon fibre really isn't a competition for titanium, especially within this context
Generally the impression I get is that Triton is a reputable and well-known brand in a stretch of extreme cycle sports with a high level of quality, workmanship, precision, customer service, and very reasonable prices. I can't really say the same for these cf frames. with regards to the 550usd base price and 520g weight of the standard Triton Sponge frame, you said: Quote:
I gotta get me one this year sometime. Sponge is it possible to make it even lighter, like you said? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
custom, titanium, triton, unicycles, wurst |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Custom Qu-Ax unicycles | 2simpl | Unicycle Product Reviews | 155 | 2014-07-31 08:10 PM |
Custom Unicycles - Why? | JJuggle | General Unicycling Discussions | 16 | 2013-02-03 04:33 AM |
Custom Made Titanium Frame's and Seatpost's | The UniSLAB | General Unicycling Discussions | 86 | 2008-07-20 03:52 PM |
=> Custom Unicycles <= | enzo ventura | Unicycle Product Reviews | 67 | 2007-12-30 10:15 PM |
custom trials from GP unicycles | saam | General Unicycling Discussions | 7 | 2005-03-17 08:26 AM |