Unicyclist Community

home gallery forums webmail links map donate
Go Back   Unicyclist Community > Non-unicycling Discussion > Just Conversation & Introduce Yourself

View Poll Results: Should we ban any discussion of Semantics on JC??
Yes. Ban Semantics! 2 20.00%
No. Allow Semantics! 8 80.00%
Voters: 10. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 2005-12-09, 01:36 PM   #33
GILD
Waffle-Tosser, Time-bider and JCTK
 
GILD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: the bustling metropolis of Nelspruitia, south africa
Age: 45
Posts: 15,567
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jethro
"masturbation performed while level testing on a unicycle in the presence of a licensed level tester is exempt."
And the practise required before going for the test?
GILD is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Tags
ban, discussion, semantics


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What are you putting off by posting on JC sarah.miller Just Conversation & Introduce Yourself 32 2005-09-23 09:57 PM
Ban Rysling jagur Just Conversation & Introduce Yourself 18 2005-09-14 03:42 PM
Happy Birthday JC! Unirene General Unicycling Discussions 30 2005-07-14 10:49 AM
Irish Smoking Ban Matt.P.Herbert Just Conversation & Introduce Yourself 0 2004-03-31 07:34 PM
Unicycle Semantics (was Re: Unicycle comparison: Miyata & Semcycle) Danny Colyer General Unicycling Discussions 1 1999-07-21 12:52 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2001-2005 Gilby
Page generated in 0.21533 seconds with 13 queries