Seth Golub
1998-07-07, 09:37 AM
"Wayne van Wijk" <wvanwijk@gil.com.au> writes:
> After discussing the problem of gearing a uni we came up with the idea of
> adjustable cranks.
I brought that up on this list/newsgroup in September 1996, and came up with
some rather lame ideas about how it might work. Other people had some better
ideas though, so it might be worth reading the old thread, which can be fetched
from Dejanews.
The URL for the thread is huge, but you can get to it from this one:
http://x3.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=183907617&CONTEXT=899801332.1685717155-
&hitnum=17
Ken Fuchs gets the DaVincii award for Best ASCII Drawing and Least Silly Design.
His note is at:
http://x3.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=184355136&search=thread&threaded=1&CONTEXT-
=899801803.1594491482&HIT_CONTEXT=899801332.1685717155&HIT_NUM=17&hitnum=7
Ken made a point about seat height too (that when you lengthen the cranks
you'll need to lower the seat), but I'd really like to see just how true that
is in practice.
If you set the seat height so you're comfortable with the cranks fully extended
(or as fully as you think you might extend them during your ride), then the
only problem is that when you shorten the cranks, your seat is at a sub-optimal
height. But you can still reach everything, and even though your legs don't go
down as far as you'd like, they also don't come up as far as they did with the
cranks extended. It seems like it'd be less awkward than riding with long
cranks usually
is.
(Why didn't I think of that 22 months ago when Ken made the comment in the
first place?)
In addition to the ideas mentioned, Jack Halpern wrote:
JH> I have quite a big file with all crank length discusions form the past.
JH> Anyone interested just shouot.
> Anybody out there interested in something like this for their Muni or Tourer?
I'd love to have this. Let me know when you're ready to ship.
> After discussing the problem of gearing a uni we came up with the idea of
> adjustable cranks.
I brought that up on this list/newsgroup in September 1996, and came up with
some rather lame ideas about how it might work. Other people had some better
ideas though, so it might be worth reading the old thread, which can be fetched
from Dejanews.
The URL for the thread is huge, but you can get to it from this one:
http://x3.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=183907617&CONTEXT=899801332.1685717155-
&hitnum=17
Ken Fuchs gets the DaVincii award for Best ASCII Drawing and Least Silly Design.
His note is at:
http://x3.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=184355136&search=thread&threaded=1&CONTEXT-
=899801803.1594491482&HIT_CONTEXT=899801332.1685717155&HIT_NUM=17&hitnum=7
Ken made a point about seat height too (that when you lengthen the cranks
you'll need to lower the seat), but I'd really like to see just how true that
is in practice.
If you set the seat height so you're comfortable with the cranks fully extended
(or as fully as you think you might extend them during your ride), then the
only problem is that when you shorten the cranks, your seat is at a sub-optimal
height. But you can still reach everything, and even though your legs don't go
down as far as you'd like, they also don't come up as far as they did with the
cranks extended. It seems like it'd be less awkward than riding with long
cranks usually
is.
(Why didn't I think of that 22 months ago when Ken made the comment in the
first place?)
In addition to the ideas mentioned, Jack Halpern wrote:
JH> I have quite a big file with all crank length discusions form the past.
JH> Anyone interested just shouot.
> Anybody out there interested in something like this for their Muni or Tourer?
I'd love to have this. Let me know when you're ready to ship.