PDA

View Full Version : 29" speed


semplice
2007-06-21, 08:39 PM
I am trying to decide whether go for the 29" or 36".
I will use it for riding the forest trails - distances not longer than 50 km.
36" will surely be faster but my car (VW Polo) might not have enough space for it.
How fast do you ride your 29"?

Ohcrazyone
2007-06-21, 08:46 PM
size Avg High
20" 3 mph 8 mph
24" 5 mph 10 mph
29" 7 mph 14 mph
36" 11 mph 22 mph

That's from the unicycling page on wikipedia.

semplice
2007-06-21, 09:49 PM
Could someone post a video with 29" ride?
I do not have an opportunity to try it and have no idea how does the ride look like - how much does it differ from 24" and 36"

johnfoss
2007-06-28, 05:24 AM
I think a 36" should fit in your Polo unless you're really tall or get a big handlebar system; those can add a lot of car-fit difficulty to the cycles. For best results try to get your hands on one so you can test-fit it...

semplice
2007-06-28, 05:35 AM
I`m 194cm :-)
I found a guy who works for the same company and owns a 36 Qu-ax :-)
The world is a small thing :-)

Hazmat
2007-06-28, 08:03 AM
size Avg High
20" 3 mph 8 mph
24" 5 mph 10 mph
29" 7 mph 14 mph
36" 11 mph 22 mph

That's from the unicycling page on wikipedia.
I've doubled that 22mph speed. :D :D

2pac
2007-07-13, 03:18 AM
^ 44mph on a coker?

nah.......

feel the light
2007-07-13, 05:01 AM
I have never tried a 29. It is geared about 20% lower then a 36. It's level here, so I wish for an even larger wheel, higher gear.
But with a 29 you could get a KH:) , and better off road tires. I wouldn't worry to much about how tall you are. It doesn't take very long to remove and replace the seat. Just mark the post for your favorite spot.
I was timed by a radar sign on the 36 a 9 mph recently. And that was faster then my cruising speed. I would guess it depends more how hilly and rough your off road course is. If you really want a 36, I bet you can find a way to bung it to your car.

kington99
2007-07-15, 05:07 PM
I have found that a 29er is not that much slower than a coker on rough ground, possibly faster in some circumstances infact. If it's very smoothe the coker will kick ass but any mud, drops, roots etc. will bring your speed right down, while affecting the 29er muhc less. And you can easily get atleast 2 cokers in a Polo, my friend does it frequently, you just need to fold the seats down.

hobo_chuck
2007-07-16, 03:51 AM
size Avg High
20" 3 mph 8 mph
24" 5 mph 10 mph
29" 7 mph 14 mph
36" 11 mph 22 mph

That's from the unicycling page on wikipedia.
3mph average on a 20"?
WTF!!??



thats less than walking speed....

i can keep up with my dad (riding a bike) on my 20" uni for quite a long distance soooooooooo...........

*cough**way-off-figures**choke*

and what about the unicycle races?
isn't the record for 100m dash on a 24" uni somthing like 18mph?WITH limited crank length?

CKCrowe
2007-07-16, 02:00 PM
those are stupid, the average is 8 for a 20 inch, 12 for a 24 inch, 29er idk and 36er's are super fast, get the 36er, you wont regret it.

kington99
2007-07-16, 03:23 PM
those are stupid, the average is 8 for a 20 inch, 12 for a 24 inch, 29er idk and 36er's are super fast, get the 36er, you wont regret it.


If you can hold 12mph over a reasonable distance on a 24" I suggest you get in to unicycle racing fast and bet on yourself heavily.

hobo_chuck
2007-07-16, 06:40 PM
nah....

dudewithasock
2007-07-20, 11:38 PM
those are stupid, the average is 8 for a 20 inch, 12 for a 24 inch, 29er idk and 36er's are super fast, get the 36er, you wont regret it.

8 miles per hour for a 20 inch? I seriously doubt that those are credible numbers, unless you think of your ass as a reliable source. :p

Hazmat
2007-07-21, 12:16 AM
8 miles per hour for a 20 inch? I seriously doubt that those are credible numbers, unless you think of your ass as a reliable source. :p
I agree with on that one. :D

rob.northcott
2007-07-24, 03:27 PM
8 miles per hour for a 20 inch? I seriously doubt that those are credible numbers, unless you think of your ass as a reliable source.
I agree with on that one. :D
(at Hazmat) Come on, you just claimed to have done 44mph on a coker :rolleyes:
That would be a 440rpm cadence!
Pot and kettle...

mouse
2007-08-06, 09:40 PM
not doable with the 44mph on a coker...not even with a geared hub.

olduniman
2007-08-07, 12:56 AM
The following formulas give the speed of a uni of wheel diameter D pedaled at a cadence C (that is rpm = rev/min)

Imperial system (mph): Speed = D*P/336.1

SI: (km/h): Speed = D*P/208.9

So the speed of a Coker pedaled at 150 rpm would be 16 mph = 26 km/h.

It is hard to imagine much higher speeds, but I don't know what a expert rider can achieve.

mouse
2007-08-07, 02:09 AM
The fastest I've ever done on a coker sized wheel was 21.5MPH slightly downhill with 110mm cranks and it was very very unstable just from the cadence wobble. Don't see how much faster you could really go without falling

rob.northcott
2007-08-07, 09:44 AM
There are reliable accounts of people hitting almost 30mph on a coker, downhill with short cranks, and not for long.
The RPM on a coker happens to work out pretty close to 10rpm per mph, so that would be something approaching 300rpm cadence, which is way more than I can do but not absolutely ridiculous (unlike Hazmat's 44mph claim!).
Plenty of good coker riders can do 20mph or so stably.
Personally I don't feel safe riding faster than 15mph (on 150s), and usually stay around 12 or 13.

Just remembered this is a 29er thread... getting a bit off-topic.

Rob

olduniman
2007-08-07, 11:21 PM
The following formulas give the speed of a uni of wheel diameter D pedaled at a cadence C (that is rpm = rev/min)

Imperial system (mph): Speed = D*P/336.1

SI: (km/h): Speed = D*P/208.9

So the speed of a Coker pedaled at 150 rpm would be 16 mph = 26 km/h.

It is hard to imagine much higher speeds, but I don't know what a expert rider can achieve.

I should have typed C for cadence instead of P, thus

Imperial system (mph): Speed = D*C/336.1

SI: (km/h): Speed = D*C/208.9

(sorry!)

siafirede
2007-08-16, 01:10 PM
I have both the 29er and the coker, but I haven't been on my 29 in a long time. Go with the coker, it is much more fun and I have no problem on light trails.

There are a few videos posted of 29er rides that I saved on my computer when I was deciding to get one. I do not know if any of the links are still active since it was over 3 years ago:

http://www.unicyclist.com/forums/showthread.php?t=32302

I might be able to repost the few videos that I saved (Joe Marshall's commute and the urban 29 riding) if those do not work anymore.

semplice
2007-08-16, 02:51 PM
These links don`t load anymore, i`m afraid.
I will not go for Coker because 29 Qu-ax cross is much cheaper and smaller.
I will do a lot of bumpy forest trails.

austingillespie
2007-08-16, 04:38 PM
If you'r going to do trails get the 29er, Cokers are mad for commuting

semplice
2007-08-17, 07:54 AM
Exactly, 29 seems to be a good choice for my purposes.
Still, i`m curious how fast can one ride on 29er?

GizmoDuck
2007-08-17, 11:52 AM
I can cruise at about 20km/hr on a 29'er/150mm cranks.
I know of lot's of Japanese riders that can cruise at 25km/hr on short cranks (eg 65mm or 89mm).

semplice
2007-08-17, 01:55 PM
I thought about getting 29er with 125mm cranks - wonder how fast could i ride with this combination?

GizmoDuck
2007-08-17, 01:58 PM
I thought about getting 29er with 125mm cranks - wonder how fast could i ride with this combination?

Depends how fast you pedal.

Only way to find out is to get one.

BoojiBoy
2007-08-29, 02:44 PM
I'm having the same debate between a 29" and a 36" myself. I plan on Riding The Lobster next year in Nova Scotia, so the 36" obviously makes sense for a 5 day 800km ride like that, but I'd like to ride trails and such aftterwards as well. The 29 seems like a good balance of speed and control to me. Which 29" uni would you recommend?

GizmoDuck
2007-08-31, 03:44 AM
If you're going to ride a 29" at RTL, you might want to get one without splined cranks/hub. That will allow you a bigger range of cranks, including down to 89mm for road riding.

ntappin
2007-08-31, 04:36 AM
Ryan Atkins is the one to talk to about 29ers, that man is a beast.

Joe_sixpack
2007-09-06, 12:30 PM
Here's the math....

Average speed, I'm assuming that you will pedal two complete rotations per second on a unicycle with a 20 inch wheel. The Circumference of the wheel is 62.83 inches, in two rotations you travel 125.66 inches in one second.

Divide that by 12 to find out how many feet per second... 10.47

Multiply by 60 to get the feet per minute... 628.30

again by 60 to get feet per hour... 37698.00

Now divide by 5,280 to convert feet per hour into miles per hour... 7.14

That's 7.14 MPH on a 20 inch wheel. That's only getting two complete rotations per second. If you pedal faster you can significantly increase your speed. Do that same math assuming you pedal three complete rotations per second on your 20 inch uni and you will wind up with 10.70 MPH. Those numbers aren't really bad on wiki.

Joe_sixpack
2007-09-06, 12:42 PM
Here's the math....

Average speed, I'm assuming that you will pedal two complete rotations per second on a unicycle with a 20 inch wheel. The Circumference of the wheel is 62.83 inches, in two rotations you travel 125.66 inches in one second.

Divide that by 12 to find out how many feet per second... 10.47

Multiply by 60 to get the feet per minute... 628.30

again by 60 to get feet per hour... 37698.00

Now divide by 5,280 to convert feet per hour into miles per hour... 7.14

That's 7.14 MPH on a 20 inch wheel. That's only getting two complete rotations per second. If you pedal faster you can significantly increase your speed. Do that same math assuming you pedal three complete rotations per second on your 20 inch uni and you will wind up with 10.70 MPH. Those numbers aren't really bad on wiki.

semplice
2007-09-06, 02:21 PM
I did the math and it comes out that when i pedal 2 rotations per second i can go 33 km/h on 29"er...

olduniman
2007-09-21, 07:15 PM
Some of the claimed speeds in this thread seemed unreasonable to me. The main issue is the cadence (pedal rpm) achievable on a unicycle of a particular wheel diameter. I took the fastest 100m and 1500 m times at NAUCC 2007 for 24 inch wheels and calculated average cadences of the winners as 184 and 166 rpm respectively. This is a surprise because I thought that since racer-level bicyclists peak at about 120 rpm, a speed such as 180 would be impossible on something as unstable as a unicycle. Obviously I was wrong.

At world record level such as for the fastest mile set by Zach Warren (14 Sep 06) on a 42 inch uni, his time was 3:26.22 for an average speed of 17.46 mph (28.09 km/h) at an average cadence of 139.7 rpm.

Repeating my formulae from a previous post: for cadence "C" rpm, wheel diameter "D" inches, the relationships are

Speed [mph] = D * C/336.14 and

Speed [km/h] = D * C/208.86

Thus Zach's average cadence = 17.46 * 336.14 / 42 = 139.7 rpm.

Assuming no mistakes in math, I think this all means that long rides claimed at high speeds should be checked for cadence to see if the value is reasonable in comparison to what the champs are doing. It would be nice to have more data and make a plots of cadence versus distance for different wheel diameters. Obviously cadence goes down with distance and increased wheel diameter. I can make the plots, if someone has the data. :)

olduniman
2007-09-21, 08:34 PM
I did the math and it comes out that when i pedal 2 rotations per second i can go 33 km/h on 29"er...
I think this is wrong by a factor of two. Two revs/sec = 120 rpm so for a 29 inch unicycle wheel the corresponding speed is 29*120/208.86 = 16.66 km/h, not 33.32 km/h.