PDA

View Full Version : flooding


skianduniaddict
2007-04-16, 02:46 PM
the whole world is being washed away

Into the blue
2007-04-16, 03:00 PM
Mm. Watch property prices on mountainsides skyrocket.

Caption: Water from the Great South Bay crashes near a house during a spring storm in Babylon, New York, Sunday, April 15, 2007

skianduniaddict
2007-04-16, 03:58 PM
ya our whole road is gone

johnfoss
2007-04-16, 04:00 PM
People on the south shore of Long Island (Babylon and several dozen other towns) have been watching the Atlantic Ocean slowly encroach onto their expensive waterfront property for man years now. It's always scary to live right on the edge of the water, especially open ocean (even the north shore, which is Long Island Sound). But the homes in the picture above are not directly facing the ocean, it's relatively shallow water doing that!

Meanwhile, here in Sacramento our levvies are worse than those in New Orleans. Looks like we're going to make it through this winter season without the "wrong" combination of storms and heavy rains...

skianduniaddict
2007-04-16, 04:02 PM
ya old orachard beach pier is taking 25 foot waves and its gonn die

ivan
2007-04-16, 04:28 PM
Hmm, the whole world?

I google-newsed it and all the hits are for America(except for a ruined wetland in Oz).

Maybe I'm doing it wrong.

Chexjc
2007-04-16, 04:33 PM
It looks like hell is freezing over here in NY. It's not quite snowing, not quite raining...it's slushing. There is just heavy chunks of slush falling from the sky. It's terrible..gets your feet all wet.

JJuggle
2007-04-16, 05:33 PM
If people would just realize that marriage is between a man and a woman we wouldn't be having these troubles.

tobbogonist
2007-04-16, 10:44 PM
he he

dudewithasock
2007-04-17, 12:27 AM
Flooding?

http://www.designsbystephene.com/prod_images_large/ijeansi587floodback.jpg

rab2009
2007-04-17, 01:20 AM
haha i don't live by the ocean i live in michigan






o shoot im surrounded by water on 3 sides.

johnfoss
2007-04-17, 06:53 PM
haha i don't live by the ocean i live in michiganYour state has more miles of coastline than any of the continental 48, including my large CA!

threeinchtire
2007-04-17, 09:36 PM
Your state has more miles of coastline than any of the continental 48, including my large CA!

Pretty sure Maine has that record. (Could be wrong though..) I'm still at school currently, but from what i've heard of home tons of people have power out and there are trees down everywhere. I think our basement is flooded a bit too. The Loaf is getting snow though....

sugarloafur
2007-04-18, 03:08 AM
In the last 48 hours, Sugarloaf has gotten over 36" of snow. My basement at home has about 10" of water in it. Places in Southern Maine recorded up to 7" of rain... yeah, there has been some flooding.

skianduniaddict
2007-04-18, 05:50 PM
Your state has more miles of coastline than any of the continental 48, including my large CA!
wrong, maine

johnfoss
2007-04-18, 07:33 PM
"3,200 miles of shoreline, the longest of any state but Alaska (http://www2.thingstodo.com/states/MI/facts.htm)" -- found near the bottom of the page. Some of these listings may be based on "ocean waterfront" or other narrowing factors. Michigan is a little weak on the saltwater but if you look at a map, it seems pretty obvious which one has more miles of water around the edges...

In my search I also read that Florida had the longest coastline as well (not counting Alaska). Now I guess we can have a battle of sources if we want... :)

http://www.50states.com/facts/michigan.htm (#28)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michigan
http://students.resa.net/stoutcomputerclass/MichiganFacts.htm
http://www.lake-trip.com/Michigan-lakes.html
etc. All the above specify freshwater, which makes it more difficult to compare.

Jethro
2007-04-18, 07:58 PM
If people would just realize that marriage is between a man and a woman we wouldn't be having these troubles.


This reminds me of back in the early nineties when the Mississippi River reached record highs around St. Louis and flooded many communities. A local preacher said it was because of all the gambling riverboats on the Mississippi. Not quite sure of his logic since the riverboats all floated around safely while the houses, churches, synagogues, mosques and temples were flooded or destroyed.

threeinchtire
2007-04-18, 10:29 PM
http://www.maine.gov/portal/facts_history/facts.html

This is what I was basing my statement on. It says: 3,500 miles...

johnfoss
2007-04-18, 11:14 PM
Hmmm. Looks like Maine has the longest coastline (it's *really* convoluted!) and Michigan has the longest shoreline, or "freshwater shorline."

Clear as mud.

JJuggle
2007-04-19, 12:13 AM
This reminds me of back in the early nineties when the Mississippi River reached record highs around St. Louis and flooded many communities. A local preacher said it was because of all the gambling riverboats on the Mississippi. Not quite sure of his logic since the riverboats all floated around safely while the houses, churches, synagogues, mosques and temples were flooded or destroyed.
All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.

threeinchtire
2007-04-19, 12:49 AM
Hmmm. Looks like Maine has the longest coastline (it's *really* convoluted!) and Michigan has the longest shoreline, or "freshwater shorline."


Yeah that makes sense.


Clear as mud.


It really is. I did some fact checking around too and is super confusing.

Jethro
2007-04-19, 01:31 AM
All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.

So are saying I should have sunk the riverboat casinos myself?

john_childs
2007-04-19, 01:38 AM
So are saying I should have sunk the riverboat casinos myself?
That would make you evil and get you caught in the middle of a logical conundrum. Are you willing to risk that others will do nothing to counter your act of evil? If others do react, will their reaction be viewed as evil by some other group and thus perpetuate the logical conundrum. Eventually a chain of events like that could destroy the world. So in hindsight it would actually be better for good men to do nothing rather than risking the destruction of the world by acting.

Jethro
2007-04-19, 01:45 AM
That would make you evil and get you caught in the middle of a logical conundrum. Are you willing to risk that others will do nothing to counter your act of evil? If others do react, will their reaction be viewed as evil by some other group and thus perpetuate the logical conundrum. Eventually a chain of events like that could destroy the world. So in hindsight it would actually be better for good men to do nothing rather than risking the destruction of the world by acting.


Not to mention that aboard the riverboats could have been a woman pregnant with the world's next Albert Einstein, Winston Churchill, Louis Pasteur or Greg Harper. She could have drowned and look what the world would have missed out on.