View Full Version : Digital8 vs. MiniDV
sabin_a.
2004-04-13, 01:06 AM
I have been looking around for digital video cameras cause i will be taking a video production and editing class at my high school next year. ( I would also film unicycling, obviously.) I think i have narrowed my choices down to 2 different camcorders.
The first one is a Sony Digital8 $399
http://www.circuitcity.com/detail.jsp?c=1&b=g&u=c&catoid=-8038&qp=0331833173319&oid=87705&m=0
The second one is a Panasonic MiniDV $399
http://www.circuitcity.com/detail.jsp?c=1&b=g&u=c&catoid=-8038&qp=0331833173319&oid=88742&m=0
So I guess what I am asking is which one do you guys/girls think would be better? (please give reasons)
thanks,
-Sabin
sabin_a.
2004-04-13, 04:28 AM
Anyone?......Anyone at all?
-Sabin
Richard Loxley
2004-04-13, 12:28 PM
"sabin_a." wrote:
>
> I have been looking around for digital video cameras cause i will be
> taking a video production and editing class at my high school next year.
> ( I would also film unicycling, obviously.) I think i have narrowed my
> choices down to 2 different camcorders.
>
> The first one is a Sony Digital8 $399
> The second one is a Panasonic MiniDV $399
>
> So I guess what I am asking is which one do you guys/girls think would
> be better? (please give reasons)
I don't know anything about these 2 cameras, but I have these
comments on Digital8 vs MiniDV:
- The Digital8 format came about because cameras were going digital
but the manufacturers still had loads of Hi-8 drive mechanisms,
so they found a way to use them in digital cameras.
- Theoretically, the quality should be the same. They use the
same digital signal, but store it on MiniDV tape or Digital8
tape (equivalent to Hi8 tape)
- In practice, MiniDV cameras tend to be better, simply because
they put MiniDV drives in the expensive cameras, and the old
Digital8 drives in the cheaper cameras. But that's a
generalisation, which may or may not be true in the case of these
two cameras.
- If you're looking to share your tapes with other people, or
borrow tapes from other people, MiniDV is the most widespread.
- If you've got a old Video-8 or Hi-8 tapes that you want to play
back, then you can do that on a Digital8 camera but not on a
Mini-DV camera.
- All things being equal, I'd go for Mini-DV. But look at the spec
of the cameras in detail. Ignore digital zoom (it's not worth
having), but a good range of optical zoom is. Good low-light
capability is worth having. Optical image stabilisation (or
the not-quite-so-good digital image stabilisation) is worth
having. A long battery life might be worth having, depending
what you're using it for. A good quality lens is definitely
worth having, although it's often difficult to tell! If one
has a lens that is obviously a bigger diameter, then that might
be a clue that it will let in more light and give better pictures.
Or if they make a big deal about the manufacturer of the lens,
then that might be a clue it's good quality.
If you get into digital video, this bulletin board has lots of
useful advice (I hang out there a lot):
http://www.dvdoctor.net/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?category=1
Hope my ramblings help,
- Richard
Memphis Mud
2004-04-13, 03:29 PM
The second one is a Panasonic MiniDV $399
I bought a Panasonic MiniDV 2 weeks ago at Walmart
"Clearance" price $325
All the regular features. It has a light too. We like it. I replaced my 1990 model RCA VHS that was so big it made me look like an ActionNews cameraman.
sabin_a.
2004-04-13, 03:37 PM
Thank you for the feedback.
I looked at both the optical zooms on each of the cameras and they are both the same. O-zoom is: 20x. They both have low light capabilities.
So I guess what you are saying is, that the MiniDV format has a lot more capabilities than the Digital8. Like you said, the MiniDV can take a more varity of tapes, so I can share them with my friends and such. Where as the Digital8 is more limited to the kinds of tapes it can take.
I do not have an old Hi8 camcorder, so there would be no use in getting the Digital8 to play back old tapes.
I guess the only minor drawback to getting the MiniDV is that the fire wire doesn't come with it.
-Sabin
Richard Loxley
2004-04-13, 03:53 PM
"sabin_a." wrote:
>
> I guess the only minor drawback to getting the MiniDV is that the fire
> wire doesn't come with it.
Do you mean a firewire cable or firewire port?
Following the links you gave, both seem to have firewire ports
(IEEE1394) but neither mention a firewire cable. Anyway, firewire
cables aren't particularly expensive.
One thing I noticed the Sony has is analog input, which the
Panasonic doesn't. I find this useful, because you can then
connect the camera to a VCR and copy VHS tapes onto digital tape.
Then you can transfer them via firwire to a computer, where you
can convert them to go onto a web page, or burn a DVD copy.
Depends on whether you see yourself doing that kind of stuff.
- Richard
johnfoss
2004-04-13, 03:56 PM
More to think about:
Digital-8 is a retiring technology. It's going to be gone soon. DV is the new stuff, and though the cassettes may change, the format of the tape should be around for quite a while. Also miniDV cameras are generally going to be smaller. This will matter to you at some point.
I don't think lens size is an indicator of light capabilities. Bigger lens means bigger glass, so that part equals out. But a bigger lens may have higher quality optics. But let the price and specs guide you there. There is a lumens or lux rating that tells how much light the camera needs. Some can shoot in the dark using infrared.
I had a borrowed Sony miniDV camera at the 1999 NUC in Washington and UNICON X in China. That camera was amazing. 12 or 16x zoom, stabilized, and lots of other great, useful features. And it was a piece of cake to use. It had one of their info-lithium batteries, that tells you about how many minutes are left on it. That was very handy. Also I liked the hand position, which made it comfortable to use. Think about those things as well.
There, I mentioned unicycle events above. We're on topic!
sabin_a.
2004-04-13, 04:02 PM
Sorry, I meant the MiniDV doesn't come with a USB Cable.
One thing I noticed the Sony has is analog input, which the
Panasonic doesn't. I find this useful, because you can then
connect the camera to a VCR and copy VHS tapes onto digital tape.
Then you can transfer them via firwire to a computer, where you
can convert them to go onto a web page, or burn a DVD copy.
Thats pretty cool!! Except, I dont have a DVD burner on my computer, so I wouldnt be able to do that. I was looking more at the Panasonic MiniDV, and you can use it as a webcam!
-Sabin
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.