Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

MOST REPLYS II: Return of the Reply

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    i just activated the 5 posts per thread option, i'll post in a minute and tell you who already has the 1000th post in MR
    --------------------------------------
    twitter> @shotofjagur

    Comment


    • #32
      nope fprget it, that would take to long not knowing any short cuts. going page by page would take to long by 5's.

      what i cant tell you is that there is currently 2996 pages in MR on that option
      --------------------------------------
      twitter> @shotofjagur

      Comment


      • #33
        time to use the CP and go back to 30 posts per.
        --------------------------------------
        twitter> @shotofjagur

        Comment


        • #34
          ok
          sien is glo maar voel is wragtag
          i'm going to go change my settings to 30 or 40 ppp and see if i can experience a difference



          aaahll bee bak
          Three short Gs and a long E-flat™ - UniHoki
          If I'm Murdered, Don't Execute My Killer.
          harper
          MikeFule Seager BluntRM
          NAMASTE!
          Dave

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by GILD
            we typed that together
            i hear what u're saying, i just don't get it
            Viewing with more posts per page would result in less clicking (clicking to get to the next page of the thread) but more scrolling. A trade off.

            There is a limit to how much I'm willing to scroll down to get to the bottom of a long long page. The trick is figuring out where the balance is between being inconvenienced by too much clicking and being inconvenienced by too much scrolling. I'm not sure where that balance point is for me. It's probably somewhere between 15-30 posts per page.

            The bulk of the page load time is the page formatting and other page overhead. The actual text of the messages doesn't add much to the load time. Messages with inline pictures though are a different matter.
            john_childs (att) hotmail (dott) com
            Team Never Wash Your Muni
            My Gallery :: Unicycling Bookmark List :: World Clock

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by john_childs
              The bulk of the page load time is the page formatting and other page overhead.
              r u saying that my thinking about that being in the cache allready and therefore quick-loading is incorrect?
              how often are pages 'unique'?
              Originally posted by john_childs
              Viewing with more posts per page would result in less clicking (clicking to get to the next page of the thread) but more scrolling. A trade off.
              that makes more sense
              i've just been on 40 ppp and read thru the first couple of pages of MR (some weird stuff in there...) and i'm definitely not a scrolling fan
              factor in the fun we have ref 'important' pages on MR, and i'm going back to forum default
              but at least i tried

              the unexamined life and all that
              Last edited by GILD; 2005-05-28, 10:24 AM.
              Three short Gs and a long E-flat™ - UniHoki
              If I'm Murdered, Don't Execute My Killer.
              harper
              MikeFule Seager BluntRM
              NAMASTE!
              Dave

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by GILD
                r u saying that my thinking about that being in the cache allready and therefore quick-loading is incorrect?
                how often are pages 'unique'?
                I'm not sure how effective the caching is for the images on the page. There are lots of little images. The avatars, all the little buttons.

                The text part of the messages is small compared to the size of the image files for the buttons and avatars that are loaded displayed and formatted for each page.

                The biggest hit though is probably the initial server communication. There's database access that needs to go on and all that. The less you have to keep hitting the server (loading new pages) the better overall. Loading more posts per page means that you contact the server less but grab more data each time.
                john_childs (att) hotmail (dott) com
                Team Never Wash Your Muni
                My Gallery :: Unicycling Bookmark List :: World Clock

                Comment


                • #38
                  aaah, the 'contact the server less but grab more each time' line of argument seems to make the most sense yet
                  i have all the avatars and little buttons floating around in my temporary internet files, so i assume they're cached and available

                  i'm quite happy with my ppp setting
                  i guess i just like arguing with jagur about it as much as enjoys ragging us page-spotters
                  Three short Gs and a long E-flat™ - UniHoki
                  If I'm Murdered, Don't Execute My Killer.
                  harper
                  MikeFule Seager BluntRM
                  NAMASTE!
                  Dave

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by GILD
                    r u saying that my thinking about that being in the cache allready and therefore quick-loading is incorrect?
                    how often are pages 'unique'?
                    Every page is unique. Unfourtunately, the current HTML for this forum software, and probably all other forum software out there, uses a lot of tables and older coding techniques to create the layout and appearance. So you are downloading it each time.

                    If it used nice and simple XHTML along with CSS to do all the layout, you'd only have to download the CSS file once and the XHTML would pretty much just contain the text, and some markup to designate what each section is. Doing it this way would save a ton of bandwidth.

                    JC is correct about the database thing where it's more efficient to grab a lot all at once.
                    Gilby

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      My world is no more.........
                      sigpic

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        yes.
                        Being back is good.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          whatever

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by Gilby
                            Every page is unique...

                            JC is correct about the database thing where it's more efficient to grab a lot all at once.
                            thanx for the definitive statement on the issue
                            is there any particular reason why they don't use the more efficient software?
                            Three short Gs and a long E-flat™ - UniHoki
                            If I'm Murdered, Don't Execute My Killer.
                            harper
                            MikeFule Seager BluntRM
                            NAMASTE!
                            Dave

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by GILD
                              thanx for the definitive statement on the issue
                              is there any particular reason why they don't use the more efficient software?
                              Yeah, XHTML and CSS is little harder to do and is newer, so not many webmasters know how to edit it and make it their own style.
                              Gilby

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by forrestunifreak
                                My world is no more.........
                                my world is more less.
                                --------------------------------------
                                twitter> @shotofjagur

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X